denimglen
Well-Known Member
Hello all, I apologise if this has been asked before, a search didn't bring much up.
My brewhouse efficiency is currently at about 66% for 20L into the fermenter.
I'm losing from 3.5 - 4L to trub in the kettle, which seems like a lot, if I can reduce this to 2L my efficiency jumps to about 73%. Whirlpooling is proving unsuccessful in my kettle and I like to get as much clear wort into the fermenter as possible.
I'm also looking into my mash and lauter efficiency as I realise my lowish efficiency may be a result of all three.
Good malt is quite expensive here so I figure that I should try and fix any losses that won't reduce quality.
While my beer's not suffering as such I'm mostly wondering what in my process may be different to others. And before I start trying to fix a problem that might not exist I'd thought I'd see how my numbers compare.
So the questions are:
What is your batch size?
How much do you leave behind in the kettle (if any)?
What is your brewhouse efficiency?
Thanks all
My brewhouse efficiency is currently at about 66% for 20L into the fermenter.
I'm losing from 3.5 - 4L to trub in the kettle, which seems like a lot, if I can reduce this to 2L my efficiency jumps to about 73%. Whirlpooling is proving unsuccessful in my kettle and I like to get as much clear wort into the fermenter as possible.
I'm also looking into my mash and lauter efficiency as I realise my lowish efficiency may be a result of all three.
Good malt is quite expensive here so I figure that I should try and fix any losses that won't reduce quality.
While my beer's not suffering as such I'm mostly wondering what in my process may be different to others. And before I start trying to fix a problem that might not exist I'd thought I'd see how my numbers compare.
So the questions are:
What is your batch size?
How much do you leave behind in the kettle (if any)?
What is your brewhouse efficiency?
Thanks all